💭 Motion Statistics
Senior | Junior Round 1

This house would automatically expel students who use drugs from their colleges. (Zero-Tolerance Policies)

35%
46%
9 Prop wins 12 Opp wins
probably balanced

That as a rich donor sympathetic to environmental causes choose to donate to eco-terrorists as opposed to climate change advocacy organizations. (Environmental Funding Ethics)

View Info Slide
12%
8%
3 Prop wins 2 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
Senior | Junior Round 2

Assuming the drugs which completely remove criminal mind from convicted criminals and change themselves into ones obedient to law & calm exist, this house would inject the drugs into all convicts & release them instead of imprisonment and death penalty. (Ethical Rehabilitation)

65%
15%
17 Prop wins 4 Opp wins
imbalanced at 1% level

That we should impose fines on public acts of climate change denial. (Free Speech vs. Accountability)

12%
8%
3 Prop wins 2 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
Senior Round 3

This house believes that it is illegitimate to shame public figures for non-criminal actions they did when they were young (e.g. partying, alcohol consumption, soft drugs use, political views etc.) (Redemption & Privacy)

View Info Slide
48%
52%
10 Prop wins 11 Opp wins
probably balanced
Senior Round 4 | Junior Round 3

In sports or teams with a culture of pressure to dope, this house would only prosecute the management (not the athlete) for the use of Performance Enhancing Drugs. (Accountability in Sports)

38%
42%
10 Prop wins 11 Opp wins
probably balanced

That industrialized nations should be forced to accept climate change refugees. (Global Responsibility)

15%
1 Prop win 4 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
Senior Round 5 | Junior Round 4

This house prefers to be a part of The '27 Club' than live an average anonymous life. (Legacy vs. Obscurity)

View Info Slide
31%
50%
8 Prop wins 13 Opp wins
imbalanced at 50% level

That we would choose to be born in World Z instead of the current world. (Utopia vs. Diversity)

View Info Slide
12%
8%
3 Prop wins 2 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
Senior Round 6

This house believes parents struggling with addiction should automatically lose custody. (Parental Rights)

67%
33%
14 Prop wins 7 Opp wins
imbalanced at 50% level
Senior Round 7 | Junior Round 5

This house as Lisa would end the relationship with Rean. (Personal Struggle)

View Info Slide
46%
35%
12 Prop wins 9 Opp wins
probably balanced

That we should keep funding climate change research, even during budget cuts. (Scientific Prioritization)

12%
8%
3 Prop wins 2 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
Junior Partial Semifinals

That environmental movements should heaviliy prioritize climate lawsuits as an advocacy strategy. (Legal Activism)

View Info Slide
100%
2 Prop wins 0 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
Senior Partial Octofinals

This house believes that the ends justify the means when it comes to fighting drugs. (Moral Ambiguity)

25%
75%
2 Prop wins 6 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
Senior Octofinals

This house as Christiania, would accept the deal to integrate into the Danish state, instead of directly combating the gangs. (Community Integration Vs Autonomy)

View Info Slide
63%
38%
5 Prop wins 3 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
Junior Semifinals

That capitalism is the root of climate change. (Economic Critique)

50%
50%
1 Prop win 1 Opp win
balance inconclusive
Senior Quarterfinals

This house regrets the trend in art (e.g., films and music) that glamorize the consumption of vices (e.g. drinking alcohol, consuming drugs, etc.) as a coping mechanism for Gen Z. (Media Influence)

75%
25%
3 Prop wins 1 Opp win
balance inconclusive
Senior Semifinals

This house would create Drug Tolerance Zones in cities with a high level of drug use. (Harm Reduction)

View Info Slide
100%
2 Prop wins 0 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
Junior Finals

That Climate activists should focus on pushing governments and large corporations to change their policies and practices, rather than urging individuals to make lifestyle adjustments. (System Change)

100%
1 Prop win 0 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
Grand Final

This house, as Uganda, would focus on expanding policy that attempts to combat the supply channels of illegal drugs (e.g. reinforcing border controls, crackdowns on amateur labs) rather than expanding policy that attempts to combat their distribution (e.g. police entrance to areas of drug commerce, online tracking of interactions between dealers and buyers). (Policy Focus)

100%
1 Prop win 0 Opp wins
balance inconclusive