💭 Motion Statistics
Round 1

This House would prioritize climate adaptation over climate mitigation. (Climate Strategy)

View Info Slide
36%
36%
5 Prop wins 5 Opp wins
probably balanced

This House, as a developing country would prioritize industrialization over strict climate commitment. (Developing Country)

29%
4 Prop wins 0 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
Round 2

This House supports aggressive government intervention in reducing carbon emissions. (Government Intervention)

50%
21%
7 Prop wins 3 Opp wins
imbalanced at 50% level

This House would ban plastic bags in all communities as a strategy to protect the environment. (Plastic Bags)

14%
14%
2 Prop wins 2 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
Round 3

This House believes that environmental activists should focus on adapting to consequences of climate change (e.g upgrading infrastructure and disaster management) rather than trying to restore the earth (e.g carbon sequestration, clean energy and efficiency). (Environmental activists)

36%
36%
5 Prop wins 5 Opp wins
probably balanced

This House believes that developing countries should do more to fight climate change than developed countries. (Climate Fight)

14%
14%
2 Prop wins 2 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
Senior Quarterfinals

This House Regrets the rise of climate alarmism (Climate Alarmism)

75%
25%
3 Prop wins 1 Opp win
balance inconclusive
Senior Semifinals

This House supports aggressive government intervention in reducing carbon emissions. (Government Intervention)

100%
2 Prop wins 0 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
Senior Finals

THIS HOUSE WOULD HEAVILY SUBSIDIZE RENEWABLE ENERGY AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHER SECTORS (Climate Strategy)

100%
1 Prop win 0 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
Junior Semifinals

This House regrets the destruction of forests for development. (Destruction)

100%
2 Prop wins 0 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
Junior Finals

THIS HOUSE AS FUTURE CHILDREN WOULD HOLD TODAYS LEADERS ACCOUNTABLE FOR CLIMATE CHANGE (Climate Strategy)

100%
1 Prop win 0 Opp wins
balance inconclusive